100,000 people...playing one game of pokemon.

Discuss new games or share memories of old

Post » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:13 am

B
44
S
10
G
10
Posts: 1,106
Reputation: 9,202

Post » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:18 am

Yip, saw that, has the game progressed? 15 min and it was still stuck in same screen. Too many people up / down / left / right even when you use democracy half still doing opposite to others.
B
65
S
16
G
9
Posts: 1,429
Reputation: 12,718

Post » Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:16 pm

I was watching this the other day. Utterly hilarious. Watch it here: http://www.twitch.tv/twitchplayspokemon
B
62
S
19
G
51
Posts: 633
Reputation: 30,826

Post » Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:30 am

Somehow this is how I have always imagined the Borg Collective would function if it were to exists in real life. Billions of lives communally directing the will of the whole. Even with a Queen (IMO a plot device to give the Borg a more character) they still would have to come to agreement of thoughts. Guess that is why there is no individuality, if everyone would make the same choice regardless it make it easier
"Were all mad here. I'm mad, your mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" Asked Alice. "You must be" Said the Cheshire Cat. "Or you wouldn't have come here"-Lewis Carroll: Adventures In Wonderland
B
7
S
2
Posts: 113
Reputation: 1,245

Post » Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:19 pm

they are just 100.000 using the same character xD? so what happened they could do something?

wow y saw a video they could have some pokemons lvl 20 xD
B
31
S
13
G
6
Posts: 355
Reputation: 5,058

Post » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:01 pm

As a big pokemln blue/red/yellow fan, I can say I felt bad watching this.
Well the basic idea is stupid by itself so I guess It is normal, for ze lulz as some say.
Game design is all about decomposing the core of your game so it becomes simple instructions.
B
53
S
22
G
18
Posts: 2,122
Reputation: 17,123

Post » Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:34 pm

Aphrodite wrote:Well the basic idea is stupid by itself so I guess It is normal, for ze lulz as some say.
You mean the fact that thousands of people connecting at one time to complete a task is stupid? Not sure if you're serious or trolling, hahah.
ImageImageImageImage
B
62
S
19
G
51
Posts: 633
Reputation: 30,826

Post » Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:12 pm

DatapawWolf wrote:
Aphrodite wrote:Well the basic idea is stupid by itself so I guess It is normal, for ze lulz as some say.
You mean the fact that thousands of people connecting at one time to complete a task is stupid? Not sure if you're serious or trolling, hahah.


you got me there x)
Game design is all about decomposing the core of your game so it becomes simple instructions.
B
53
S
22
G
18
Posts: 2,122
Reputation: 17,123

Post » Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:55 am

wouldn't be better to have tons of people playing with his own character than tons of people playing only one player at a time?
B
31
S
13
G
6
Posts: 355
Reputation: 5,058

Post » Sat May 24, 2014 11:53 am

katzin wrote:wouldn't be better to have tons of people playing with his own character than tons of people playing only one player at a time?


I guess yes.

Unless you want your game to show the constant fight between each 9art of the human mind, which does not know where it's future lies, unifying uo and down, lef and right, b and a, select and start, anarchy and democraty, towards a unique goal so his life can finally come to the best possible conclusion, Or maybe I should go see a psychologist.
Game design is all about decomposing the core of your game so it becomes simple instructions.
B
53
S
22
G
18
Posts: 2,122
Reputation: 17,123

Next

Return to Game Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests