3 things I'd like to see in future programs

New releases and general discussions.

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:26 pm

Deleted.MaxMan7772012-08-28 20:37:32
B
2
G
3
Posts: 42
Reputation: 934

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:54 pm

[quote="MaxMan777":c1scn14o][quote="Lost my Keys":c1scn14o]

Mini-thread hijack - You got me wondering, does construct accept the analog input of the XBox 360 left and right triggers too, or are those just seen as on or off?[/quote:c1scn14o]

It's accepted but it's not very accurate, and you definitely need it to be moreso for sports games.[/quote:c1scn14o]

its extremely accurate, down to 3 decimal points you can control it with your slightest touch to alter it. the rheostats are extremely precise for a simple controller, and its impossible you'd need more precision because your fingers just wouldn't even be able to decisively control them anyways. just make a text object display the output of a trigger or control stick and youll see what i mean. the slightest movement WILL affect the value.

As for the the stick accuracy being off. no thats not correct, its moreso the way games handle the sticks output thats off. the resting position not properly being accounted for, and probably your punts or whatever, not going in the proper direction is due to the stick not accounting for view angle in the proper manner, making it seem like the control is "off" because things don't go where you were logically aiming them when its simply bad programming and bad methods for handling control (which sports games are notorious for).

[quote:c1scn14o] In Construct there are some issues with the analog sticks accuracy and the way it decides which stick is being activated for certain commands.[/quote:c1scn14o]

this is once again bad programming on your part, and bad methods for doing things. if your even using the analog input properly, your post makes no sense, because sticks are never "activated" they simply relay the value the rheostats are getting to the program. its up to you to decide where the dead zones are and when your sticks are accepting input through your programming. you decide everything, so its a problem with the way your handling input. adding a simple falloff type curve to the output you get using some math would greatly improve how your control is affected based on how tilted the stick is. but thats completely up to you to set up, because you need to tailor things to your game and tastes, not construct.

anyways, im only trying to help with your quoted analog stick problem here, and your coming off pretty rude to me acting as if you had deeper meaning to what you were saying in that section of your post. i said your coming off a bit ignorant because your trotting around thinking you know all the problems with everything when you've got 0 experience with construct besides your simple football game related endeavors and problems, which are probably only existing through your single project due to some strange mistake you've made without realizing (which happens to everyone, but even still, you just throw them around as if they exist outside of it, and are the cause of problems which you couldn't ever be sure of ).
B
52
S
7
G
6
Posts: 1,945
Reputation: 7,610

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:04 pm

[quote="MaxMan777":21ebaqbi]
Please don't call me ignorant, that's not civil or accurate, especially considering that you completely misunderstood my entire post...

This has nothing to do with my experience in Construct and if you read what I talked about more carefully without assuming,

[quote="QuaziGNRLnose":21ebaqbi]as for sports games needing to have many roudabouts to be made, thats not true. anything you try to make is gonna prove to have some difficulties. try setting up a boss in a platform game for instance. to give it seperate attack patterns that activate as time goes on and at random, your gonna have to do a lot of stuff that isnt simple. but if you think about how you could do it, its seems pretty clear after a while what exactly you have to do, and how you can build it with the hammer, wood, and nails construct gives you. this goes for anything your trying to make.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

Yes, but all of that is completely beside the point and really has very little to do with this.
[/quote:21ebaqbi]

I think you need to stop, take a few steps back, and rethink how you're approaching your game idea. Nothing about this game so far is impossible, or even all that complicated, but it is perhaps above your skill level at this time and you'd be better off experimenting with smaller projects, learning the software and going from there. As for dismissing other's comments. They're actually a lot closer to the answers you need (but perhaps not the ones you want), than you're giving them credit for, and you shouldn't outright dismiss them like that.


[quote="MaxMan777":21ebaqbi]I'm considering that, but I'm not sure how far it can go. Once my Phase 1 and Phase 2 prototype is done, I don't have any plans to complete the entire project this way. It was never my intent to do the full game this way, only a prototype. I'm fairly certain just because of the controller issue alone that a good retail football game is not totally possible in the current state that programs like MMF and Construct are.

I have another plan for the final project in place, but failing that using Construct might be a consideration.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

Nothing wrong with the controller system, but I think you're thinking too far ahead talking about retail games.

[quote:21ebaqbi]I don't know if "requirement" is the only qualifier. I could probably make the same statement about a number of things already in Construct like the AVI object for example. But it should be there and it should be supported because if the idea is to be able to make any type of game, then in that regard it becomes a requirement in and of itself.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

As I've explained and continue to explain. You can make the game you're talking about, you're just going to have to use events to do it. Though as I say, it's probably above your current skill level at this time. But it's certainly possible. And if you've read any of my past posts, you'll know that I wouldn't say that unless I believed it.

[quote:21ebaqbi]If you only consider the people here or most of the people using the product right now, yes, but that's not looking at the big picture. When more of these things are available you'll start to see more creators in this genre. I see requests for this same sort of stuff in XNA forums all the time, but it's not available so the sports gamers dream dies before even getting a chance. They have templates for every other type, but not sports.

Look at RPG Maker and others of its type. There are large communities of non-C programmers using those, and there are just as many non-C programmers dying for a chance to do the same thing with sports games... but it's just not available yet.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

Erm yeah, you're comparing two very different demographics, which unfortunately makes that a mute point. RPG gamers are very different to Sport fans. And out of the almost 2000 users on this forum, you're the only one I've seen who's asking for something like this. Regardless of your claim that there are large communities out there dying to make football games. It's 1% asking for it right now. Course, if they were all to come and request such a thing to be including in construct, and there was enough call for it. The devs may come up with some kind of alternative or feature which could help. But I wouldn't count on it, as I say, it's too specific and wouldn't do anything you can't already do quite easily if you broke things down into their component parts.

As I and others have said, what you're wanting would simply cause a great many obvious clones. There would be little originality, and would end up ignored just like any that are using the ghost shooter template.

[quote:21ebaqbi]
Hmmm... Annoying how exactly? I don't quite understand. When there is a group of operations specific to a template, if you don't desire to make that type of game you'd never even see them since you'd never open the template...
[/quote:21ebaqbi]

I don't think you've checked out how the templates work. They're still really just regular caps, examples as it were.

[quote:21ebaqbi]When I mention accessibility being an issue, this probably makes you furl your brow because a lot of the people here are so familiar with the program or have had a lot of experience in more complex programs or C, it all seems like no big deal. But there is another faction of very talented concept designers that will never figure out how to make these types of games work in Construct or MMF or similar programs, because on the surface it doesn't "speak" the language they understand to even do the simplest operation of the sport they're trying to recreate.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

As I say, if you read any of my posts, you'd know I'm not a programmer. But I still think there would be no real difficulties (not what I would consider difficult) in doing what you're wanting to do with construct at this time. It just seems complicated to you, that's all. I've seen far more complex things done with it though.

[quote:21ebaqbi]Difficulty depends on how realistic you want it to be. To make 10-yard Fight, probably not so much. To make Tecmo Super Bowl, much more difficult, though not impossible. To make anything above that, virtually impossible unless you're a genius with this program and have incredible attention to detail that can stand the community scrutiny which even Madden in all it's complex programming glory has not been able to do.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

I just had a look at those. There's nothing there that couldn't be done in Construct, with varying degrees of knowledge (but even then, it still just all boils down to the basics when you strip everything else away).

[quote:21ebaqbi]There are so many nuances to making an American Football game work properly it's just not done by single programmers, and even large teams have routinely failed. Programs like Construct eliminate a lot of the hassle, but you're still unlikely to turn out a final product better than Tecmo Super Bowl. That's why I know that prototype is more than likely my limit for now and to go further I'm going to have to hire a team of C programmers to work with me.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

The thing is. If all these companies, with their millions of dollars investment, amazing talent pools, far more advanced tools than you're going to find on the shelf, and ability to code things from scratch in C++ or whatever, with access to costly software the common user hasn't. It's illogical to think construct, or the average Joe off the street could do it better by including a few behaviors or making things easier to setup.

Though you have proven a point I've been trying to make for some time. New users hear "easy" and think exactly that, and their requests and questions are based on "can it do" and not "how's it done" or is it possible for them to do. So can construct do what you're wanting? Yes it can. Could you, yourself, do it at this time? No, I don't think you could, and you should practice with the software more, learn how the various area's work, test things and gradually go from there.

Everything you're wanting can be broken down into component parts and tackled separately and simply. If you've really worked in commercial game development like you said you have, you should already know that. :) Football, like everything, is based on rules. From a game point of view, you've got further rules, such as how the ball will behave (well there's physics to handle that). The player AI, again, can break that down so they behave and obey the rules of the game easily enough. Yes you're going to have to get your hands dirty and use events, no it wont be a case of clicking some options and pressing a few buttons. But it's still much easier than you can imagine.

There just isn't, and never will be a "make game X now" button. Yes construct and it's ilk make things easier. But if pro's can't get something right with all their resources and money available. Then something like construct in the hands of a new user has little chance of shaking the foundations either.


[quote:21ebaqbi]I have some experience with HTML, I built sites and templates for a few years, but I'm more of an editor than a coder. That said, would the average person know how to do that? Nope, that's where templates come in.[/quote:21ebaqbi]

Well then they have to learn don't they. You can't expect to walk in off the street and be able to do anything you want without any practice or knowledge.
B
3
S
2
G
3
Posts: 628
Reputation: 2,531

Post » Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:52 pm

Deleted.MaxMan7772012-08-28 20:39:50
B
2
G
3
Posts: 42
Reputation: 934

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:33 am

Quazi and MaxMan777, neither of you are coming across as civil and polite in this thread, and I will simply lock the thread if anyone continues to be in the slightest bit bitchy. I don't know why it's so hard to be understanding and diplomatic on the internet, but you've come to the wrong forum if you want to argue.

[quote="MaxMan777":11iqh9ah]There are so many nuances to making an American Football game work properly it's just not done by single programmers, and even large teams have routinely failed[/quote:11iqh9ah]
MaxMan777, I am not getting your point. Do you want me (or Davo, the only other active developer) to go to all this effort that defeats large teams and is fraught with nuances and time consuming coding? And for what, a thousand identical football games with superficial differences?

We who make Construct do it in our spare time, unpaid, as volunteers. Our goal is not to make pre-made but moddable games - there are already loads of tools out there for that, and a lot of them seem to suck. Our goal is to provide, in Construct, a useful set of tools and high-level primitives (eg. Sprites) that can be used easily to make original games. I don't see your idea fitting in with that - but other developers can always extend Construct as they like with plugins and behaviors. I think that's your best option if you want to take this idea to Construct.
Scirra Founder
B
359
S
214
G
72
Posts: 22,952
Reputation: 178,600

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:51 am

Deleted.MaxMan7772012-08-28 20:40:24
B
2
G
3
Posts: 42
Reputation: 934

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:55 am

Deleted.MaxMan7772012-08-28 20:41:39
B
2
G
3
Posts: 42
Reputation: 934

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:15 am

Deleted.MaxMan7772012-08-28 20:41:55
B
2
G
3
Posts: 42
Reputation: 934

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:12 am

[quote="MaxMan777":17m6bekc]I respectfully disagree with your view there. You can clearly see where I was attacked[/quote:17m6bekc]
I respectfully also disagree, since this sounds like "he did it" to my ears. You could've dealt with it better. But Quazi could also have worded his post better, hence I asked both of you to calm things down. All I'm trying to do is run a forum where threads don't get bogged down in to flamewars, it's too common on the internet.

[quote:17m6bekc]I posted some ideas, and I think anyone would agree that they have been met with some very fierce (and somewhat puzzling in its ferocity) opposition, but I think a lot of it was due to misunderstanding[/quote:17m6bekc]
I speak only for myself, but I welcome ideas. I hear a lot of ideas on these forums which is great. But I haven't got anywhere near enough time to even start a lot of these ideas. My way of filtering is to argue against ideas I don't think are viable (and I sit at a feasibility/hours of my time point of view, as I'm sure you gathered!). The best ideas will stand up to skepticism provided they have a well reasoned arguer behind them. That's my view anyway, things tend to get a bit more chaotic with everyone throwing in their two cents ;)

Anyways I hope you're not discouraged from posting other ideas, I certainly hadn't even thought of sports games at all before your post, so that was an interesting angle to hear. Thanks for the post :)
Scirra Founder
B
359
S
214
G
72
Posts: 22,952
Reputation: 178,600

Post » Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:23 am

... post fail, editing
B
3
S
2
G
4
Posts: 1,445
Reputation: 4,665

PreviousNext

Return to Construct Classic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests