So, as it stands, the top 3 look like this:
Apart from the Console option, there's not a lot there for commercial use.
I suppose it comes down to what the Dev's ambitions for Construct 2 are.
If it's similar to what MMF2 seem to aim for, then maybe the Web browser option will do.
If, however, they want to cater to both casual game makers and Indie devs on a more professional level, then I think it's important that they future-proof Construct 2 as much as possible.
The Mac will always be there, XNA technology will no doubt be utilised in the next version of the XBox, and both Android and iPhone are very important.
Although it might be more work than they envisaged, if the Devs want Construct to be taken seriously, I really think they should consider including the following out of the box:
Web Browser or Flash
Unfortunately, if the poll is anything to go by, this isn't going to happen, and looks less likely that Construct 2 will be for me.
Which is a shame, because Construct is by far my favourite R.A.D tool.
While tools like Stencyl and App Inventor will no doubt get better, currently, Construct has a huge lead over them (Qualifier: I beta test both) and should take that on-board when planning Construct 2.