[quote="deadeye":vb8ckizj]I just want to interject something here...
[quote="3kliksphilip":vb8ckizj]Construct has better hardware support and physics,[/quote:vb8ckizj]
Yo, check this out:My First Skydiving Academy
Physics in MMF. One of the most polished MMF games I've ever seen, too. It's damn near flawless.
MMF might have it's physics drawbacks, but so does Construct. MMF can do per-pixel stuff, whereas Construct can't. It's likely there will always be differences like that between the two, causing people to waffle on which one they want.
So if it's a matter of sitting on the fence, well... go with MMF for now. It is more viable. It's a much more complete product, and hence a more logical choice for game development at the moment. The time you spend mulling over which product to use you could spend instead on creating something cool.
Other than that, I agree with ssbfalcon. Just give it time. It'll all come together eventually.[/quote:vb8ckizj]
You're forgetting the main thing :
Compare Construct 1.0 to MMF 2 without extensions.
Construct 1.0 wins so much.
MMF2 has extensions, but Construct supports them too! So it's up to the community to create whatever they need, a pixel physics? Other stuff? All possible with plugins.