Crosswalk Performance Mega-thread

Discussion and feedback on Construct 2

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:05 am

@imaffett

The last Crosswalk 12 beta that I used was 12.41.296.4
Now Crosswalk 12 is stable with version 12.41.296.9

Where is the changelog?
I can't find it anywhere. Well, it's just curiosity :/
https://crosswalk-project.org/documentation/downloads.html
B
71
S
20
G
10
Posts: 641
Reputation: 9,648

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:42 pm

@imaffett

Here's the blurriness, it's subtle but noticable.

Image

link to the store version
ImageImage
B
25
S
6
G
8
Posts: 774
Reputation: 6,645

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:08 pm

any news about crosswalk 7 OpenSSL issue after the new update ?
B
15
S
5
Posts: 192
Reputation: 1,514

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:35 pm

@imaffett

I'm building with CW 12, and then the Build Log says that XDK is using 12.41.296.4
When is Intel going to update to CW 12.41.296.9?
B
71
S
20
G
10
Posts: 641
Reputation: 9,648

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:09 pm

Iolva wrote:@imaffett

I'm building with CW 12, and then the Build Log says that XDK is using 12.41.296.4
When is Intel going to update to CW 12.41.296.9?



We generally do not update every incremental release Crosswalk has, unless there is a major issue.
Intel Corporation
B
5
S
2
Posts: 133
Reputation: 871

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:10 pm

Egyptoon wrote:any news about crosswalk 7 OpenSSL issue after the new update ?


What news? It's up to Google to rev the Open SSL version to remove the false positive. I encourage C2 users to create an issue and star it.
Intel Corporation
B
5
S
2
Posts: 133
Reputation: 871

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:12 pm

Iolva wrote:@imaffett

The last Crosswalk 12 beta that I used was 12.41.296.4
Now Crosswalk 12 is stable with version 12.41.296.9

Where is the changelog?
I can't find it anywhere. Well, it's just curiosity :/
https://crosswalk-project.org/documentation/downloads.html


Hi @lolva - You should direct any questions to the Crosswalk team. You can raise an issue on github or send a tweet to them.
Intel Corporation
B
5
S
2
Posts: 133
Reputation: 871

Post » Fri May 01, 2015 12:08 am

imaffett wrote:
Egyptoon wrote:any news about crosswalk 7 OpenSSL issue after the new update ?


What news? It's up to Google to rev the Open SSL version to remove the false positive. I encourage C2 users to create an issue and star it.

It's up to intel xdk, it's up to crosswalk, it's up to Google, it's up to anyone except me!
what i supposed to do ?! how do i create an issue and star it?
That's what I'm talking about and no one want to listen, depending on 3rd parties makes C2 a useless software.
Everybody says: it's up to someone else.

if anybody reported this issue to Google please share the link to star it.
thanks
B
15
S
5
Posts: 192
Reputation: 1,514

Post » Fri May 01, 2015 5:04 pm

imaffett wrote:
Iolva wrote:@imaffett

I'm building with CW 12, and then the Build Log says that XDK is using 12.41.296.4
When is Intel going to update to CW 12.41.296.9?


We generally do not update every incremental release Crosswalk has, unless there is a major issue.


Hmm, so what's the point that the Crosswalk team has made an update for CW 12 if you are not going to push it to production in the Intel XDK?

I'm sorry for saying this:
There is so bad to wait for:
1: Chromium updates
2: Crosswalk updates
3. Intel updates their buildings with the last Crosswalk updates

I understand that there is nothing you can do for points 1 and 2, but you can change the point 3
There has to be a major issue in order to update it?
B
71
S
20
G
10
Posts: 641
Reputation: 9,648

Post » Fri May 01, 2015 9:10 pm

@imaffett

Okay, would the following text still be applicable? If so, I will file it as a security bug in the chromium issue tracker, and start a thread to let C2 users star-bomb it :P

This application uses the Crosswalk 7 WebView which is based off of Chromium 36.0.1985.144. This version of Chromium includes the Open SSL fixes found at https://chromium.googlesource.com/chrom ... 25d0b079c3
c5547f07948684f80c4e9c3584

The Chromium team did not rev the Open SSL identifier, so it still reports 1.0.1e as the Open SSL version. You can verify this in the commit log at https://chromium.googlesource.com/chrom ... sl.version

You can find the Crosswalk commit that updates to Chromium 36.0.1985.144 at https://github.com/crosswalk-project/cr ... a3d9e68e05

Thank you


Considering how tardy google has been in the past though, I'm wondering: wouldn't it be possible to patch the version number at some stage on intel's end? Or is it lost in the morass of the chromium code base?

Really frustrating how much trouble we are going thru because someone can't tweak a string value along the way. :mrgreen:
Don't lose your work. Backup your game with Dropbox.
B
43
S
10
G
10
Posts: 1,106
Reputation: 9,147

PreviousNext

Return to Construct 2 General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests