Do You Want To Redesign Our Site?

New releases and general discussions.

Post » Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:50 pm

It think it could be good to use wordpress. Blog structure is very easy to use.
B
30
S
15
G
10
Posts: 285
Reputation: 7,144

Post » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:29 pm

No, I think we want to show more content on the front page than a simple blog.
Scirra Founder
B
359
S
214
G
72
Posts: 22,951
Reputation: 178,578

Post » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:37 pm

So far, I root for alee and aritz.

Their designs look neat, tidy and professional.
B
6
S
2
G
3
Posts: 520
Reputation: 2,690

Post » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:52 pm

Haha awesome. Use joomla/drupal or something if your going for a CMS?

We should make TEAM ALEE/ARITZ considering my design is basically your design...
B
2
S
2
G
5
Posts: 448
Reputation: 2,546

Post » Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:27 am

Okay, I did a pretty large overhaul of my original design, so here's the revamped one:

Link to image
Moderator
B
98
S
37
G
19
Posts: 1,584
Reputation: 17,817

Post » Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:04 am

Newt had a totally sick looking concept he was passing around the chat... I wonder what happened to that one?

I may still have a crack at this, but with new baby and everything coming home it's going to be hard to find any real time for it.

So far, I like Quazi's design the most out of them all... it's just so shiny! And the new Construct logo design he has come up with looks awesome as hell.

~Sol
Tired of crappy file hosts that are crappy? Get DROPBOX - https://db.tt/uwjysXJF
Moderator
B
45
S
17
G
37
Posts: 2,853
Reputation: 25,966

Post » Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:57 am

I'm not sure about Quazi's design, looks nice although it seems more like an advertisement rather than a long term site. The Big C logo seems very detached visually from 'construct', I think the 'onstruct' may need a bit more experimentation.
B
134
S
65
G
16
Posts: 1,766
Reputation: 19,190

Post » Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:47 am

my site was made on the most limited space, so thats why its a lil add-ish i didnt have room to fit anything else.

i didnt know what exactly was wanted in terms of size so i went with a small single screener, everythings cramped up so it looks like an add yes, i can modify it to look better.

as for the Construct thing, i could perhaps lower the c gear down a bit, i dont think i did any better or worse job than anyone else when you compare it to alees Cconstruct, or megas weird gear ect.
im going to edit my page later and repost it with proper modifications
B
52
S
7
G
6
Posts: 1,945
Reputation: 7,610

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:11 am

I did small redesign of the top part

My professional Royalty Free Music at Scirra Assets Store
--------------------------------
Specs: i5 2500, 16gb of ram, gtx 770, win 7, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Mackie mr8mk2, Alesis 320, browsing the net on chrome.
B
71
S
19
G
19
Posts: 1,919
Reputation: 16,910

Post » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:45 am

Seriously, devs you need to decide what to do about the logo.
Obviously from the tons of different versions its a major part of the design.

Also there should be some more input as to what direction you want this to go, otherwise your either going to be stuck with a design your unhappy with, or your going to have to go pro and buy one somewhere.

Anyway rants over... cept needs more teamwork, less clusterf^$k.
Image Image
B
161
S
48
G
90
Posts: 7,356
Reputation: 66,767

PreviousNext

Return to Construct Classic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests