Intel XDK moving away from standard Cordova Apps?

Discussion and feedback on Construct 2

Post » Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:35 am

Please see link: https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-xdk/topic/700951

If I understand correctly, XDK will move away from publishing regular cordova apps. How does this affect us as Construct 2 users exporting using cordova? My apologies if I ask it here. I haven't done my research on "Internet of things (IoT)" and probably need better explanation about this link above.

I use cocoon.io as an alternate to xdk. But of course, I prefer xdk. Bottom line: is XDK going away as a build tool for Construct 2/HTML5 games? Thanks in advance for an explanation.
B
28
S
11
G
15
Posts: 47
Reputation: 9,533

Post » Sun Oct 30, 2016 5:23 am

It should be fine IF you have your keystore file and iOS certificates etc. You can re-sign it with the respective Android/iOS tools.. since the export is Cordova based, you can move it to another platform that supports Cordova.
B
70
S
24
G
19
Posts: 1,757
Reputation: 17,614

Post » Sun Oct 30, 2016 7:13 am

What does this mean ?, now there is no agreement between Scirra and XDK ?.
B
29
S
12
G
20
Posts: 756
Reputation: 13,855

Post » Sun Oct 30, 2016 5:47 pm

@Silverforce I do have my keystores and certificates on back-up. I guess I'm going to have to start using cocoon.io more now.
@Mirlas I'm still not sure. Just have to wait and see if there's any updates on this from Intel.

@Ashley any thoughts on this?
B
28
S
11
G
15
Posts: 47
Reputation: 9,533

Post » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:12 am

It doesn't sound like they have any immediate plans to drop support, but I asked Paul to clarify.

Even if the XDK completely shut down, there's always PhoneGap Build and other build services. It is not and has never been the only build system you can use.
Scirra Founder
B
387
S
230
G
87
Posts: 24,248
Reputation: 192,238

Post » Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:25 pm

Ashley wrote:It doesn't sound like they have any immediate plans to drop support, but I asked Paul to clarify.

Even if the XDK completely shut down, there's always PhoneGap Build and other build services. It is not and has never been the only build system you can use.


It's true that XDK is not the only one build system we can use, but it's - if I'm not mistaken - the only one officially supported at the moment? So I believe the concern is if Scirra will start officially support some other build system in case XDK will no longer be an option for us?

Some time ago (in this post) you said:
Ashley wrote:If you're talking about Canvas+, that has been officially unsupported for some time now, because it's incompatible with so many features it basically never works. So if you try to use it you are on your own and should not have any expectation of it working correctly.


Which means (at least I understand it this way) that Scirra does not guarantee that our app build with unsupported build system will work at all, and will not take care of solving issues related with those platforms.

I hope Intel will not abandon us ;). We already have a lot of problems with plugins for mobile development and switching old projects to different system will probably be seriously problematic.
ImageImage
B
27
S
16
G
67
Posts: 934
Reputation: 38,072

Post » Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:34 pm

Um, I haven't tried it, but shouldn't the Cordova Cli work as well?
Image ImageImage
B
168
S
50
G
163
Posts: 8,221
Reputation: 105,061

Post » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:18 pm

BackendFreak wrote:It's true that XDK is not the only one build system we can use, but it's - if I'm not mistaken - the only one officially supported at the moment?

No, we always have, and still do, support PhoneGap Build. I actually prefer it myself because it's simpler than the XDK - just upload a zip and download an .ipa/.apk back - but for some reason it doesn't seem to have gained the same popularity as the XDK (guess because the free version is limited to 1 app, but you can replace it with different ones!)

Canvas+ was never a real browser engine, and we dropped it as part of dropping support for the non-browser engines which were always incredibly painful to work with. Ludei have other platforms which are based on browser engines now.
Scirra Founder
B
387
S
230
G
87
Posts: 24,248
Reputation: 192,238

Post » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:35 pm

This is why I pray to the Code Gods that Construct 3 has Native support. I'm really tired of these third party options. You will never know when they will "quit" on you... No matter how many 3rd party build system your software may support.
Image
B
81
S
16
G
4
Posts: 501
Reputation: 8,934

Post » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:02 pm

KazaaMafia wrote:This is why I pray to the Code Gods that Construct 3 has Native support. I'm really tired of these third party options. You will never know when they will "quit" on you... No matter how many 3rd party build system your software may support.


I would pay a lot more for Construct 3 if it had a native export option for:

PC, iOS & Android. The rest can be optional or 3rd party... so it's less work for Scirra. They would only need to maintain 3x native export compatibility. :)

This is the biggest demand feature from Construct 2's user-base for so long..

It could also be a paid subscription service or whatever but C3 needs it to be complete.
B
70
S
24
G
19
Posts: 1,757
Reputation: 17,614

Next

Return to Construct 2 General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hiran Rodrigues and 1 guest