Interstellar; thoughts? *Can contain spoilers*

Chat about anything not covered in these forums, but keep it civil!

Post » Sat Nov 08, 2014 11:28 am

Yo,

Went to see Interstellar last night, and it was so boring, that I not only rushed out of the cinema when the first credits rolled, but also go to so depressed I had to buy myself bottle of wine and drink it all. I should have asked for a redound. There was a lot of people on that evening screening, and my god almost all of them where bored too! They would be yawning, talking, checking time on their phones, looking around the cinema. With exception of some visuals, which where nice, this movie is absolute trash, with it's chopped up and nonsensical story. And the messages I've got from it were really inconsistent. First with "Fuck the earth and leave" with this one having its half conclusion mid-film, with the scene on the frozen planet, where Mat said that he was not expecting that the earth might be actually so unique, which was cool, but then the earth go shafted anyway, and they ended up living on halo. It is very troubling to me because philosophy in movies is a reflection of a global view most of the time. And having a view like this, on our beautiful planet is hurting. We should explore the space but trough that exploration we should make our own home a healthy place, which it once was.
My professional Royalty Free Music at Scirra Assets Store
--------------------------------
Specs: i5 2500, 16gb of ram, gtx 770, win 7, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Mackie mr8mk2, Alesis 320, browsing the net on chrome.
B
89
S
30
G
22
Posts: 1,985
Reputation: 20,099

Post » Sat Nov 08, 2014 11:35 am

Haha at least now I know to avoid that movie. Sounds......really boring! I guess it must be one of those movies where they talk and talk, (based on the beliefs and views of the script writer), than add a little action just so that they have something exciting to put in the trailer. Haha I guess it isn't even worth downloading online?
B
45
S
23
G
31
Posts: 687
Reputation: 20,600

Post » Sun Nov 09, 2014 2:26 pm

Well it all depends what are you waiting from a movie. If you want to see a big blockbuster with robots fights and vfx and all. A no brain movie with just visuals then eventually it's not a good movie.

Actually I liked it. Because it was different from what is going on in the movies these times.
The only thing I didn't love acutally was music. Being a composer myself and seeing Hans Zimmer making hype of this movie telling it was his best soundtrack made me laugh. Because it was "bad" sound design and almost no theme. An omnipresent organ and some instruments that weren't intented to be there at certain moments. This broke some atmosphere moments.

Apart from that it was a good dystopian movie. Better than labyrinth. And the narrative style was quite interesting.


Actually after the movie I was depressed because I was born too soon and I will probably never see the alcubierre drive in action. Nor any other extraterrestial form of life.
B
9
S
3
G
1
Posts: 128
Reputation: 1,116

Post » Mon Nov 10, 2014 4:48 pm

I'm a big sci-fi fan so i thought i'd enjoy it more than i actually did. Whilst i did like it i thought it was way too drawn out (could have been edited to half the length) and tried too hard to be 2001 space odyssey.

Also don't know if it was the cinema or the film but a lot of the time i couldn't hear the dialogue for the music and main actor has a thick accent any way which made it harder.

Lastly i don't get why they had to actually leave the Earth, it's not like it was about to explode, they could have built sealed shelters or domes on the ground and controlled the environment the same as in a space station, instead they opted to settle on a world super close to giant blackhole because they couldn't figure out the formula to control gravity or something so they could get their ship off the ground.

Still better than the disappointing Prometheus and makes a change from a comic book movie.
B
43
S
23
G
20
Posts: 735
Reputation: 12,027

Post » Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:29 pm

Maybe hard to translate all the feelings during the movie into english, but Ill give it a try:

Wanted to go to the cinema on monday, not knowing what movies are in cinema the past days. So I dont knew what kind of movie it was at all, only "drama", from the maker of Inception and about ~190 minutes long.
I love things about (the) universe(s) and sci-fi stuff, if its not too far grabbed on our near future. The film was great, Ild even say that it hit my "top 10" movies list (which doesnt really exist, its just a point for my "how great it is/was" ranking to keep a balance :D). I like the storyline, how it is shown and telled, duo to its rather long duration of about 186 minutes, the movie is more filled with details and aspects instead of action/ fight scenes/ explosions/ whatever. For me the film is much more a philosophical piece than an entertaining one. Story behind it and its scenery are more real in comparison to nearly all "things which currently happen" titles and the logic of the whole plot can (talking about dimensions) be fully doable.
I can imagine that you can not like it because of its style and art to "tell you things", but I loved it (in the hope of not have anything spoilered :D).

Regardy,
Proxymity
B
24
S
14
G
9
Posts: 118
Reputation: 6,799

Post » Fri Nov 14, 2014 7:18 am

i thoroughly enjoyed it. it did not even seem to be three hours long because i was engaged with it.

having said that, i can see how others would not like it, or have a taste for it. i don't have a taste for country music, but i don't believe it is inherently bad. but it pains me that some are simply saying they don't like it because that is the cool thing to say about a movie that is expected to do well. unfortunately, because of christopher nolan's past body of work, which i like, he attracts a considerable amount of fashionable hate.

i don't envy the position he has put himself in.

but i admire his courage.

he is attempting to make great films.

just because they are not received well, or understood, does not mean he has failed. were that the case, then many 'great' directors would not be considered such. @Ethan, you say he tried too hard to be '2001'. that is funny because if we are to judge his movie by it's 'reception' than he has succeeded, because '2001' was all but panned for a number of reasons including scientific inaccuracy, when it was first viewed. it was not understood or even acknowledged for it's greatness until many years later.

but for those who truly and honestly dislike it, i have only one question. why chose this particular film to publicly voice your displeasure? have you done so with every movie you disliked this year? or is there a 'reason' you chose to express your opinion about this particular one?

ok, that was three questions, i apologize...lol.

hope this does not become an out of control flame thread.
B
81
S
32
G
23
Posts: 1,053
Reputation: 35,965

Post » Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:00 pm

@harrio i didn't dislike it, just didn't like it as much as i thought i would. I guess my expectations were too high. It's the first time i've discussed the film here and i wasn't aware how others had received it or any negative press it might of gotten. Theres nothing wrong with a philosophical movie but for me it doesn't excuse fundamental plot flaws.

You might well think i'm missing the point of the movie but I try not to be so deep when thinking about them, generally after i've seen a movie i ask myself would i watch it again, the answer here is maybe, if it was on the tv one sunday night and i was flicking through the channels and it happened to be on.
B
43
S
23
G
20
Posts: 735
Reputation: 12,027

Post » Sat Nov 15, 2014 6:23 am

@Ethan,

i was not picking on you. i hope you did not think so. i was asking people to assess their own internal motives.

to answer your question, hopefully, they had to leave the earth because it could not produce food any more, so it could not sustain the population.

kind of like when large herbivores overgraze a patch of land. once they have depleted it faster than it can regrow, they have to move on to another patch of land. only in this case, the earth stopped replenishing. so the only place to go was to another planet capable of sustaining human life and growing food.

i hope that sorts it for you.
B
81
S
32
G
23
Posts: 1,053
Reputation: 35,965

Post » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:01 am

I watched Interstellar too and it wasn't that bad. I mean, yes, it was touted to be very big before it actually released, and I did think a lot of hard work has gone into it on the part of Christopher Nolan. But one major putting-off factor (not only for me but for many others) I feel was the huge amount of science incorporated into the movie, aspects and principles of physics and stuff. Agreed, the directors might have decided to make the events in the film seem as genuine as possible, but then, another way to look at it from the audience's point of view is this: A majority of us more often than not go to watch a movie for the purpose of getting entertained (at least I do). And so, I wouldn't like it much if I'm going for a movie to get myself perked up after a long and tiring day at work and I have to use my brains to dissect the facts in the movie itself. It should majorly be entertainment material, which doesn't require too much of thinking. Agree?
B
3
Posts: 13
Reputation: 205

Post » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:11 am

@Jason234,

i agree with you that movies should be entertaining. i also agree that watching movies that do not require a lot of thinking are fun. like 'ace ventura' or 'the expendables'. but different people are entertained by different things. some people like to be challenged mentally by movies like 'primer' , 'dinner with andre' or 'time crimes'.

my point being, if you do not like mentally challenging movies, it is not hard to avoid them. especially when that it the sole type of movie that a particular director ever makes...like christopher nolan.

if you are 'put off' by science and such, then it stands to reason that you should avoid a christopher nolan movie, which includes science.

simply because his movies can be hard to understand for many, even without the presence of science.
B
81
S
32
G
23
Posts: 1,053
Reputation: 35,965

Next

Return to Open Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dwm247 and 1 guest