Isometric...

New releases and general discussions.

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:02 am

Hey guys
Being a big fan of Tiberium sun, i thought i'd make an isometric strategy game, but it's proving harder than i thought it would be. How would one go about doing that exactly?
B
2
G
4
Posts: 13
Reputation: 1,076

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:16 am

Isometric games are possibly the HARDEST kind of 2D game to make. Period.

I would highly recommend starting with something a little easier, or perhaps using a pseudo isometric view (like in Legend of Zelda) where it's really top-down, but not... if you catch my drift. Even then, you will have LOTS of fun making sprites for it, as they will need at least 16 directions so they don't look badly animated... but preferably more.

I would recommend using a 3D application, like 3D Studio, Blender, ZBrush, or similar to make your sprites... that way you can make any angle easily.

The other way you could attack the problem is by making it more of a turn based game like Civilization... that way you could easily get away with more "iconic" style vehicles/troops/etc.

~Sol
Tired of crappy file hosts that are crappy? Get DROPBOX - https://db.tt/uwjysXJF
Moderator
B
45
S
17
G
37
Posts: 2,853
Reputation: 25,966

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:33 am

I disagree on the difficulty of isometric. You don't have to treat it as a 3D world behind the scenes. All it is, is your usual flat square rotated and squished for the illusion of perspective.

Treat the world as any other top-view 2D world and you'll find the only added challenge to be the extra angles you'll want for your sprites.

RTS also couldn't be easier with Construct having selection box, turrets and even pathfinding for units build right in!

I say go for your idea, but do start small. Try a few units moving around a simple area. Then build complexity as you get the hang of it.
B
2
S
2
G
5
Posts: 391
Reputation: 2,432

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:42 am

Sure Jeswen, isometric is easy... if the world is completely flat.

Somehow I doubt that's what Posessed wants though.
Moderator
B
5
S
2
G
6
Posts: 4,348
Reputation: 10,971

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:53 am

When you make your isometric walls, be sure to create two separate objects, one that is a flat collision mask, and one that's the wall itself, because you will only want the collisions to occur on the base of the wall. While it is a planned feature to add custom collision masks, it hasn't been done yet so that technique is the next best thing :P

Also try out the 'for each ordered' condition. Add a family like blue or something to every object that is isometric, and then loop each blue ordered by its Y position, and bring it to the front. That will make the player go behind and in front of walls etc.
B
4
S
2
G
5
Posts: 641
Reputation: 3,011

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:56 am

[quote="deadeye":2q5bpde3]Sure Jeswen, isometric is easy... if the world is completely flat.

Somehow I doubt that's what Posessed wants though.[/quote:2q5bpde3]

Haha, no ... you treat each layer of depth as a flat world ... adding a second layer of height means changing a value from 1 to 2 and adding it as a condition.

It's not so difficult :roll:

This is why I say, pretend it doesn't have depth. Look at everything as flat. You make it too complex if you treat Z as an actual depth position rather than "layer 2" etc.

On a side note, I'll be sure to be a smart ass towards you yet again deadeye, since you give me the honor!
B
2
S
2
G
5
Posts: 391
Reputation: 2,432

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:55 am

I really don't think it's as easy as you're trying to make it out to be. And how exactly was I being a smartass?
Moderator
B
5
S
2
G
6
Posts: 4,348
Reputation: 10,971

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:57 am

[quote="deadeye":308h7ahu]And how exactly was I being a smartass?[/quote:308h7ahu]

Somehow I don't think I can answer that ...
B
2
S
2
G
5
Posts: 391
Reputation: 2,432

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:30 am

At the end of the day, an isometric view game isn't hard to make, but it is far more time consuming...

- Several extra sprites for the rotation of objects
- Collision masks for EVERYTHING
- Drop shadowing for objects like bullets and rockets etc so they don't look "stuck to the ground"
- Seamless tiles are also harder to make in isometric view

The list, I'm sure, goes on.

It's certainly a plausible possibilty to make iso games... I have done it before with less powerful software... it's propbably just not the best thing to start a first project with in my humble opinion.

~Sol
Tired of crappy file hosts that are crappy? Get DROPBOX - https://db.tt/uwjysXJF
Moderator
B
45
S
17
G
37
Posts: 2,853
Reputation: 25,966

Post » Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:16 am

Keep in mind that i'm not a first timer, i have a lot of experience with construct-ish programs like mmf and gamefactory.
And yeah, i'm struggling with making my little soldiers move along a grid...that seems to be the hardest part for now.
B
2
G
4
Posts: 13
Reputation: 1,076

Next

Return to Construct Classic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests