The question is how big a draw would something like this be, vs doing a chain of expressions?
I mean Im imagining that each additional point added to the proposed would at to computation exponentially, so obviously there has to be a drop off point. You couldn't do something like lerp^100(1,2,3,4,5....
Then if you were to use several lerps or quads how bad would the transition between them be?
Because from the layman's point of view conjoining expressions like this would be somewhat contrived, and there's bound to be some skipage between expressions.
@Drasa yeah spline would be a better name.
Perhaps a spline, or path object might be better, but if it were implemented I would want the ability to use the defined points with other calls as well, no point in just making a static curve.