Little debate.

Chat about anything not covered in these forums, but keep it civil!

Post » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:58 pm

Welcome. I want to try to work out in the debate.
Like the rules of the forum is not allowed.
Let's try to arrange a debate on the theme: "One-party vs a lot of parties" (meaning the administration of the state).
Show their internal "politics".
I'll start.

I for one-party system.

One-party system gives a lot of advantages:
+ Small amount officials- this will reduce costs treasury and it will save a lot of money.
+ After the previous plus, the country has a large supply of money. This money can be spent on the salaries of doctors and teachers. Then maybe medetsina in the country and education will be free and then you should not be spending Huge amounts of money on education and treatment.
:|
B
47
S
8
G
4
Posts: 72
Reputation: 8,412

Post » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:59 pm

If you'd like to compare one party vs two party system, try reading Age of Ambition by Evan Osnos. It gives insight into China's recent rise from a third world country to a heavy market player.
Project Lead of Zems Online Card Game

Producer at Impulse Limited
B
18
S
6
G
3
Posts: 677
Reputation: 5,224


Return to Open Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests