Petition to change Construct3 subscription payment

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:32 pm

Rectify is wise, if they do not change they will lose many users
CODE FOR FUN
B
22
S
8
G
2
Posts: 74
Reputation: 2,349

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:48 pm

I really think you are making a mistake with the annual subscription.
I'm from Argentina. C2 user.

I have made my first game, Orange Adventure on Construct2 (http://store.steampowered.com/app/510280/) but even though the game has quality, I do not live to develop games. It's more of a hobby.

And my situation is repeated in thousands of users who do not use the software for months, but then re-develop once time has passed.
South America it's a totally diferent market. A $99 year subscription is more expensive than an year Adobe Full suscription in my country.

I'm starting developing my second game in C2. I was looking forward to the C3 ads, but now I think I'll stick with C2 or GM2 instead.

I can not afford such a costly subscription for something I use a few months a year as a hobby.

Image

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVgcFdHOl6w
B
5
S
1
Posts: 13
Reputation: 407

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:52 pm

Facundo Sanchis wrote:I can not afford such a costly subscription for something I use a few months a year as a hobby.


Youll be able to use the free version of C3 that will cost you $0.00 per year.
Image
B
30
S
9
G
3
Posts: 171
Reputation: 3,334

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 7:14 pm

gameglaux wrote:
Facundo Sanchis wrote:I can not afford such a costly subscription for something I use a few months a year as a hobby.


Youll be able to use the free version of C3 that will cost you $0.00 per year.

If C3 free edition is gonna be like C2 free edition it'll be borderline useless :P If they follow the Unity route on the other hand, that's a different story.
B
40
S
16
G
6
Posts: 543
Reputation: 7,649

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 7:28 pm

chadorireborn wrote:How about... :D
Business License: Subscription ($240/yr)
Personal License : Subscription ($120.00/yr)
Not Yet Earning: $60.00 (One Time)

@Ashley , @Tom ... Sorry about lately, that was my disappointment striking...
How about considering this?


A very well put suggestion! Thumbs up!
B
33
S
10
G
6
Posts: 259
Reputation: 6,801

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 7:49 pm

gameglaux wrote:
Facundo Sanchis wrote:I can not afford such a costly subscription for something I use a few months a year as a hobby.


Youll be able to use the free version of C3 that will cost you $0.00 per year.


if its the same as the free version of C2, that answer is everything but smart..
Image

Image
B
38
S
14
G
7
Posts: 408
Reputation: 8,338

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 7:53 pm

IJCT wrote:
gameglaux wrote:
Facundo Sanchis wrote:I can not afford such a costly subscription for something I use a few months a year as a hobby.


Youll be able to use the free version of C3 that will cost you $0.00 per year.


if its the same as the free version of C2, that answer is everything but smart..

+1

If they're gonna go that route then least give the player the full technical capabilities of the program but maybe leave out only the Monetization part for the Licensed versions.
Image Image Image
B
32
S
12
G
27
Posts: 761
Reputation: 17,246

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:09 pm

I've loved Construct 2 and I'm planning to keep using it, but I'm not earning money as to consider any suscription.

If Construct 3 can work offline, why not just offer the online services for that suscription and keep the one time payment for a license?
B
14
S
7
Posts: 18
Reputation: 1,234

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:12 pm

JaredX wrote:Most people here who use & enjoy C2 are hobbyist, myself included. I will not pay a subscription fee for C3.


My sentiments exactly.
B
71
S
41
G
24
Posts: 356
Reputation: 18,464

Post » Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:19 pm

with this price ... goodbye
B
7
S
3
Posts: 54
Reputation: 687

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests