Should I use C2 for a large game?

Discussion and feedback on Construct 2

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 4:01 am

Game Dev Tycoon is a HTML5 app. Compiled with node-webkit, exported to Windows, Mac and Linux.

Take it look.

http://www.greenheartgames.com/app/game-dev-tycoon/Joannesalfa2013-05-10 04:02:06
B
96
S
25
G
20
Posts: 3,055
Reputation: 22,644

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 4:16 am

[QUOTE=jayderyu]What's really holding back C2 from big games isn't the tools. it's that there are no development teams that can dedicate the time and resources. Even the kickstarter C2 projects are usually only 1 or 2 people and the goal isn't that much.[/QUOTE]

I mainly agree: as I mentioned in my post above, responding to Arima, there have been some remarkable games from just one or two-person studios (Braid had phenomenal gameplay, artwork, and music, even if the storyline was questionable and the writing hacky at best), and I think Ubi, AirScape, and a couple others are great ambassadors for C2. I thought extremely hard myself before choosing C2 for my current project, and for someone of my resources and skill level, and given the type of game I'm making, I absolutely made the right choice.

Since all I've got right now is a mouth and vaporware, I'm not in too much of a position to start talking about being the one to create the breakout C2 game, but if I can make the relatively simple one I'm working on now, then I'm going to want to have some serious discussions with Yann, Telles, Ashley/Tom about what we can really get C2 to pull off. You'll know I'm getting close when my "How Do I?" requests get progressively less sophomoric.

C2 definitely needs someone to make that standout, flagship game which puts the brand on every game blog and inspires future development. Somehow, we're going to have to cultivate that person or team who can put in the time or resources.

And as for your note about 3D, that was my point--C2 may be phenomenal for certain games, but it's not a tool for *every* gameRandomExile2013-05-10 04:18:50
B
50
S
15
G
11
Posts: 366
Reputation: 12,043

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 12:20 pm

[QUOTE=RandomExile]I was thinking down the lines of, can C2 be used for truly high-quality, large-scale projects? Right now, C2 has no flagship game which really highlights its full capabilities, so as someone who's still quite a newbie when it comes to development, I probably have a decent idea what might theoretically be done with C2, but on the other hand, without that shining example I might be underestimating it.[/QUOTE]

I feel that you are, as you state, underestimating it. It seems you're basing your opinion of what C2 can do upon what has already been done with it. Having been using CC/C2 for five years for many experiments as well as my own games, I feel strongly that C2 can be used for virtually any 2D game you can imagine short of hardware limitations and requiring stuff like sprite distortion, which Ashley has said will probably get implemented at some point. Seriously, almost every 2D game that has ever been made could be made in C2. If C2 had sprite distortion even vanillaware level stuff would be possible.

[QUOTE=RandomExile]No one's yet made an RPG with C2 that anyone would consider buying[/QUOTE]

Well, no one's completed one yet, but that's because they're quite complex and take a long time to make. There are some that are in the works. :)

[QUOTE=RandomExile]T:ToN and PE both use pre-rendered backgrounds with true 3-D characters and creatures, which C2 might be able to duplicate some of, but I'd just have to see a playable demo (or have Ashley or Tom promise it's so) to believe it's possible or practical to make a game on par with even Planescape: Torment, Fallout 1&2, or Neverwinter Nights. C2 doesn't have to be the perfect tool for all games, just the best one for some.[/QUOTE]

I'm still not sure why you keep mentioning 3d games like NWN. C2 is 2D. I'm hoping for 3D at some point, but comparing what C2 can do to 3D games is an inaccurate comparison. And there's no reason why C2 can't be the best tool for all types of 2D games. That's one of the best things about it, it's not limited in the types of games it can make (again, aside from 3D).Arima2013-05-10 12:24:49
Moderator
B
88
S
32
G
33
Posts: 3,005
Reputation: 27,432

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 2:57 pm

[QUOTE=Arima] I'm still not sure why you keep mentioning 3d games like NWN. [/QUOTE]

Well, if it helps, you can ignore NWN, although based on what you were saying, 2D pre-rendered backgrounds, the right collision masking, and artful use of lighting could in theory largely replicate it, albeit without "free-look" features. Fallout 1&2, Planescape, etc., though ... ?

I think it would be great if C2 were the best 2D tool for all types of games, but for certain genres it would take much more support for certain elements specific to it. (Right now you can make a platform in seconds, but there's no "inventory" type which is fundamental to an RPG, for example.)
B
50
S
15
G
11
Posts: 366
Reputation: 12,043

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 3:39 pm

[QUOTE=RandomExile] I think it would be great if C2 were the best 2D tool for all types of games, but for certain genres it would take much more support for certain elements specific to it. (Right now you can make a platform in seconds, but there's no "inventory" type which is fundamental to an RPG, for example.)[/QUOTE]

You will never find perfect tool for doing everything everybody wants.
C2 is a perfect tool for any 2d game genre (not 2.5d, not 3d). It's more like a game engine or framework and it's only up to You how You want to use it.

Inventory? I've made full inventory system with options like examine items/logs, read logs, combine items, use items.. in one day using arrays and families - with only simple knowledge about arrays.

There is no game making software which allows you to do everything with one mouse click. You have to do some work manually.shinkan2013-05-10 15:41:19
ImageImageImageImage
B
140
S
58
G
36
Posts: 2,547
Reputation: 31,170

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 3:45 pm

[QUOTE=RandomExile] I can't think of a reason why C2 couldn't be used for hugely successful games like SpaceChem or Braid, but the truth of our current state of affairs is that virtually all of even C2's best games would fall into the above-average hobbyist range[/QUOTE]


@RandomExile: Braid took Jonathan Blow 3 years to make on his own, as a full time job.
C2 is 2 years old, and some of the features (like Functions) are less than 6 months old.
Do the maths from there.

On a personal note, I found myself realizing I have much troubles working on the very same project for long extended period of times.
After a month or two, I have troubles keeping motivated in the project and find myself toying with new prototypes/ideas.

For games in that scope, C2 is just excellent.
New to Construct ? Where to start

Image Image
Image Image

Please attach a capx to any help request or bug report !
Moderator
B
247
S
85
G
40
Posts: 7,000
Reputation: 57,795

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 5:28 pm

Kyatric, I think we actually agree, except you and Arima have a more concrete understanding of C2's full capabilities. It seems like AirScape might represent the best of the last "generation" of C2, and like I said, AirScape is fun and commercial.

But based on that, and the number of failed or perpetually delayed or truly bad RPGs we've seen, C2 of the past hasn't been the right tool for that genre. You point out, which one of my own observations, that C2 has drawn mainly small-project short-timeframe devs.

We need to find/cultivate devs like Jonathan who will make high quality long-term projects . If I were Scirra, I'd consider encouraging or in some way sponsoring a team capable of delivering a commercial game perhaps ultimately funded via Kickstarter.   You'd want at least one programmer like Yann or Rojo, one of the crazy talented artists I've seen here, and a writer/designer. Putting out one remarkable indie game would do the whole community/brand a truly transformative amount of good.
B
50
S
15
G
11
Posts: 366
Reputation: 12,043

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 5:32 pm

I agree with Kyatric, C2 has only bloomed in the last six months, so there has simply not been time for a large complicated game to be developed and released, however a successful game, irrespective of "size" would fly the C2 flag just as well, and we don't have that yet either..."Quantity, has a quality of it's own"...

I guess much of this is due to C2 being aimed at "beginners" who have grand ideas but little skill and knowledge of fundamental, game structure to bring them to fruition.

I'm vouching for Loot pursuit to be the "Big hitter" as it's been in development for a few years, on Classic, so basically, has a head start...

Pixel perfick2013-05-10 17:37:33
As long as I can move left, right and fire, I'm Happy...
B
42
S
15
G
11
Posts: 655
Reputation: 12,260

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 6:16 pm

@RandomExile

We just released Happiness! this past March.

Happiness! at Blue Key Games

It's about as long as your average Mega Man game. It was done in the course of less than a year, mostly by myself. It's actually pretty deceptively complex for a platformer. It's because you hug things rather than kill them.

I've got a small team together now. We're working on an SNES style action RPG. It's coming out pretty awesome. Should have something to show off soon, which is bound to get a whole ton of "how did you do that?!" types of questions. Should be fun!

C2 is fully capable of any 2D game project you can think of. It's just a matter of patience, logic, and skill. But mostly patience.
B
58
S
20
G
7
Posts: 305
Reputation: 8,804

Post » Fri May 10, 2013 6:43 pm

[QUOTE=RandomExile] Kyatric, I think we actually agree, except you and Arima have a more concrete understanding of C2's full capabilities. It seems like AirScape might represent the best of the last "generation" of C2, and like I said, AirScape is fun and commercial.

But based on that, and the number of failed or perpetually delayed or truly bad RPGs we've seen, C2 of the past hasn't been the right tool for that genre. You point out, which one of my own observations, that C2 has drawn mainly small-project short-timeframe devs.[/QUOTE]

It's true that having large projects that at a glance prove C2's capabilities to people, rather than having people need to use the program and see the potential, will bring in more 'power users/teams' but I don't think it's much of a problem. Showcase games will come with time.

I agree with Kyatric that C2 hasn't really been 'ready' for a large game for that long - certainly for less time than it would take to make a large game - which is a very major part of the reason why what C2 has had made with it are smaller games.

I wouldn't worry about either the subjective quality of some of the games that have been attempted or the failed attempts at such. Game making is hard, much harder than it seems to be from the outside, surprising new developers often even when using tools to make it easier like C2. On top of that, RPGs are crazy complicated to make. Even a simple one like mine still has an utter ton of systems that have to all work smoothly together, which requires proper code design, which most people starting game dev don't have knowledge of how to do.

I also hope you're not judging the quality of C2 based on how long it's taking me to make loot pursuit - I don't want to get into some of the details, but some of the reasons it isn't done are it's sort of my first game (made a small unreleased unfinished shmup before it), and as mentioned a complex one at that and I had no idea what I was doing when I started, and tackling an rpg was something I wasn't as ready for as I thought, resulting in a mess I eventually couldn't deal with anymore (remember what I was saying in the previous paragraph? ^^;) on top of CC's bugs, prompting me to restart it from scratch in C2 a few months ago, and throughout it's development I haven't been able to work on it nearly as much as I'd like, which is the biggest reason it's not done.

[QUOTE=RandomExile]We need to find/cultivate devs like Jonathan who will make high quality long-term projects . If I were Scirra, I'd consider encouraging or in some way sponsoring a team capable of delivering a commercial game perhaps ultimately funded via Kickstarter.   You'd want at least one programmer like Yann or Rojo, one of the crazy talented artists I've seen here, and a writer/designer. Putting out one remarkable indie game would do the whole community/brand a truly transformative amount of good.[/QUOTE]

Even then, it would still take quite a while for that dev to finish the game. C2 might have a standout game on it's own by then. I know there's at least one person trying to make one. :)

[QUOTE=Pixel perfick]I'm vouching for Loot pursuit to be the "Big hitter" as it's been in development for a few years, on Classic, so basically, has a head start...[/QUOTE]

Thanks! I'm hoping it manages to impress. Though, as mentioned, I restarted it recently in C2, so it's a ways off (a vague guess is it's about 2/5 done).
Moderator
B
88
S
32
G
33
Posts: 3,005
Reputation: 27,432

PreviousNext

Return to Construct 2 General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests