stencyl being nice to construct?

Chat about anything not covered in these forums, but keep it civil!

Post » Sat May 02, 2009 11:56 am

Nah, it will result to nothing. They'd just get annoyed and delay much longer
B
16
S
10
G
5
Posts: 255
Reputation: 3,934

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 1:58 pm

when Stencyl first came out they had pictures/screenshots but, they took tham down because the picture showed that you can make a that you can make the classic game like Mario, Megaman, etc.
They didn't want their product to be associated with fan games.
In fact if you do a google image search you can see some off their old pictures they use to have on there site and someone posted a video of Stencyl on youtube
[url:3ct1y54l]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QF60pgrh8a4[/url:3ct1y54l].
So they got rid of all of this on there site to keep a way the product from the fan game mentality.
And now there have nothing to show on their site.
B
21
S
4
G
4
Posts: 280
Reputation: 2,934

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 2:09 pm

That doesn't explain anything. Why don't they release some screenshots now, to prove they're not vapourware? It doesn't even have to be of a specific game. It could just be the UI.
Scirra Founder
B
359
S
214
G
72
Posts: 22,946
Reputation: 178,478

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 3:05 pm

Hey i am not disagreeing with you. I just telling you guys what they did, and why did it.
I am loving contruct It is in the in the top ten programs that I ever used.
With out a doubt in my mind it haves more/better features then what stencyl may have.
When it come out I see people using Stencyl leaving it and coming to construct.
B
21
S
4
G
4
Posts: 280
Reputation: 2,934

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 pm

[quote="Ashley":15r98mww]It could just be the UI.[/quote:15r98mww]

That's something that I've been wondering for a while. It's one thing not knowing what games will look like under Stencyl, but to not even see the interface? It's probably more important to everyone to know how the program is laid out than any demo screenshots.

I know I've made fun of Stencyl's "stealth mode" but it's a potential new game developing program and they ARE promising something unique to most others (java-based engine -- cross-platform support). Even if they didn't have anything special I still want them to succeed just so that people have one more option to choose from.

I guess most of all I just don't understand their decision to become a fully-fledged company. It's a free program and they've stated repeatedly that they will not charge for it at any time in the future (just going to have to trust them on that, I guess...), so what would becoming a company do for them?

Who would invest in a program that is going up against many other programs in the same field that are already professional, established solutions... when the only source of income from that product is donations and ad money?

Anyway this semi-recent quote from Jon is sort of interesting;

[quote:15r98mww]On the contrary, we're close to completion on the actual software, and it's down to the point where I've personally listed out everything that remains, so it's just a matter of time before I reach the end of that.

Of course, as I said in the post, the software is only one component of beta - the other parts also need to be done, and they aren't as far along as the software is at this point in time.[/quote:15r98mww]

Soooo... yeah. It's going to be a while still before they even start their "closed-beta" (invitation only). :|
B
4
S
2
G
4
Posts: 401
Reputation: 2,302

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 4:15 pm

So,... I'm confused...

How can they be making "software" where the "software part" of the "software" is only "part" of the "software"?

Are they giving away free computers with it or something?

Have they invented half-flacidware? Like, a combination of hardware and software combined?

Have they figured out some way of making software out of something else besides 1's and 0's?

I r confused.

~Sol
Tired of crappy file hosts that are crappy? Get DROPBOX - https://db.tt/uwjysXJF
Moderator
B
45
S
17
G
37
Posts: 2,853
Reputation: 25,966

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 5:35 pm

Maybe they figured out a nice business model and it's still in talks?
B
3
S
2
G
4
Posts: 1,445
Reputation: 4,665

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 5:56 pm

[quote="Caspis Sinclair":3863fmra][quote="Ashley":3863fmra]It could just be the UI.[/quote:3863fmra]

That's something that I've been wondering for a while. It's one thing not knowing what games will look like under Stencyl, but to not even see the interface? It's probably more important to everyone to know how the program is laid out than any demo screenshots.

I know I've made fun of Stencyl's "stealth mode" but it's a potential new game developing program and they ARE promising something unique to most others (java-based engine -- cross-platform support). Even if they didn't have anything special I still want them to succeed just so that people have one more option to choose from.

I guess most of all I just don't understand their decision to become a fully-fledged company. It's a free program and they've stated repeatedly that they will not charge for it at any time in the future (just going to have to trust them on that, I guess...), so what would becoming a company do for them?

Who would invest in a program that is going up against many other programs in the same field that are already professional, established solutions... when the only source of income from that product is donations and ad money?

Anyway this semi-recent quote from Jon is sort of interesting;

[quote:3863fmra]On the contrary, we're close to completion on the actual software, and it's down to the point where I've personally listed out everything that remains, so it's just a matter of time before I reach the end of that.

Of course, as I said in the post, the software is only one component of beta - the other parts also need to be done, and they aren't as far along as the software is at this point in time.[/quote:3863fmra]

Soooo... yeah. It's going to be a while still before they even start their "closed-beta" (invitation only). :|[/quote:3863fmra]


Because they plan on have a website that people can place the games, and sell games there to more then one platform. so they will do a closed beta until they have a product where they can make a profit off of it. Their decided Profitability over their passionate community. At this point the're thinking a head of they self in that aspect.
B
21
S
4
G
4
Posts: 280
Reputation: 2,934

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 7:44 pm

[quote="Caspis Sinclair":34f0bzjk]...[/quote:34f0bzjk]

Hehehe, from my experience, software is never done, or it at least takes you much longer than you ever anticipate... Construct has probably been due to reach 1.0 by Christmas every year since 2007, and even when we do reach 1.0, that's far from the end! It's only just the beginning... ;)
Scirra Founder
B
359
S
214
G
72
Posts: 22,946
Reputation: 178,478

Post » Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 pm

[quote="Ashley":1u5v86ie][quote="Caspis Sinclair":1u5v86ie]...[/quote:1u5v86ie]

Hehehe, from my experience, software is never done, or it at least takes you much longer than you ever anticipate... Construct has probably been due to reach 1.0 by Christmas every year since 2007, and even when we do reach 1.0, that's far from the end! It's only just the beginning... ;)[/quote:1u5v86ie]

It's the same with everything that's being created: webs sites, films, books, songs - creators would alweys change something after relising their work.
My professional Royalty Free Music at Scirra Assets Store
--------------------------------
Specs: i5 2500, 16gb of ram, gtx 770, win 7, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Mackie mr8mk2, Alesis 320, browsing the net on chrome.
B
71
S
19
G
19
Posts: 1,919
Reputation: 16,910

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gfisher2003 and 0 guests