Surface Pro 3

Discussion and feedback on Construct 2

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:16 pm

Hi Guys,

Just wondering do you think a surface pro 3 would be fine for developing with Construct2 I realise its not the best option but its to use it as a portable development environment. The main reason I am concerned is the fact that it uses the Intel HD graphics and the recommendations for construct is to not use the Intel graphics as its support is lacking, is this still true? Is anyone using a Surface Pro 3? My only other option was to get a Macbook Air and bootcamp it.

Thanks

Kind Regards

Chris
B
5
S
1
Posts: 29
Reputation: 433

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:47 pm

If it has a keyboard and mouse option, it would probably be fine. Construct 2's UI is probably a bit finnicky to use with finger touches.
Scirra Founder
B
395
S
232
G
88
Posts: 24,371
Reputation: 193,762

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:51 pm

Personally, I'm really hyped on a Surface 3. Mostly because I like to draw and the wacom stylus is absolutely stunning. I am a happy owner of a Surface Pro 1 and I have c2 installed, but the screen is way too small for it to be nice developer experience. Surface 3, however, have a little bigger screen.

If your sole purpose are developing and you aren't a graphic artist, I would look for a laptop.
My game Petrolhead Tactics is now on Steam Greenlight. I could not have done this without C2 ? Please rate, if you like!

Steam client already open: petrolheadtactics.com/steam
Web: petrolheadtactics.com/greenlight
B
20
S
4
G
4
Posts: 132
Reputation: 4,130

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 2:21 pm

Im not an artist, I just want a small form factor light mobile way to do dev with construct. Plus I was thinking I could attach a full screen if needed at work. I was playing with the surface 3 in pc world today and it is very very nice and snappy. My only concern was with the Intel graphics drivers is that still an issue?

This is from the https://www.scirra.com/manual/6/system-requirements post.
"A nVidia or AMD graphics card with latest drivers. We recommend you avoid any hardware using Intel graphics chips due to their poor performance, stability, and feature set."
B
5
S
1
Posts: 29
Reputation: 433

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 8:23 pm

Dell XPS is a better option from what I've seen. Linus tech tips goes over quite a few problems with the surface pro.
Image
B
243
S
30
G
13
Posts: 1,787
Reputation: 18,770

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:10 pm

Thanks for your help guys, yeah its a tricky one I don't think the things Linus Tech mentions puts me off too much (funny guy to listen to though and very good review so thanks for the heads up on that). I do like the XPS's my only thing is I would like to see one and feel one and I can't really do that without buying it :(
B
5
S
1
Posts: 29
Reputation: 433

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:07 pm

Yeah if you've already got to try one out and are happy with it then by all means go for it. I only bring it up because I was also looking to get a Surface Pro 3 so I'm not glued to my computer desk when working on games, but learned it has some 'issues'. I suppose it's a matter of preference as the specs are pretty similar. As for the integrated gpu..there aren't too many options under $1000 :T
Image
B
243
S
30
G
13
Posts: 1,787
Reputation: 18,770

Post » Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:11 pm

Yeah the more and more I read the more and more I'm put off but can't help myself thinking about how nice it would be to just have it next to me have a wave of creativity boot up construct and experiment or sketch an idea out with the stylus. I'll keep the post up to date and let you know how it goes if I get a surface! Or if I've decided against it.
B
5
S
1
Posts: 29
Reputation: 433

Post » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:37 am

I use a Samsung Ativ Smart Pro (equivalent to Surface Pro 2) with an intel i5 with HD4000 graphics and it is 100% fine for C2 development. Updated drivers mean the integrated GPU can do all the WebGL effects fine and with decent performance.
B
70
S
24
G
19
Posts: 1,757
Reputation: 17,614

Post » Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:01 am

Message: jakobdam can only post plain text URLS until they have 500 rep. 1 URLS modified. Why?
Surface 2 PRO is a fine tool; I've tried it several times, and tested many types of applications on it. A solid Windows (8.1) experience.

I'd think that the major drawback for using it with Construct 2, is the small screen size vs. high resolution. This gives you an insane PPI, which can make stuff hard to see and work with.

Also worth mentioning is that Surface Pro 3 has arrived;
http://www.microsoft.com/surface/da-dk/ ... face-pro-3

- Even if you don't need those specs, the Surface Pro 2 price will drop signicantly, as the Pro 3 replaces the Pro 2 on the store shelves.

One major drawback on the Pro 3, is that the pen touch is made by N-Trig, whereas Pro 2 has Wacom pen touch.

I by FAR prefer Wacom; not because the precision is all that much better than N-Trig when we're talking these types of screens, but the DRIVER that N-Trig provides, is worth less than a stick in a dog shit. Photoshop, Paint Tool SAI etc. all requires a working WINTAB driver, for them to support pressure sensitive pen input; and N-Trig's Wintab driver is the worst - barely working, if at all. There's forum threads all over the internet with people having had and still having issues getting the damn thing to work; whereas Wacom always just works.

So for me, the Surface Pro 2 is the most interesting, especially because I don't need the 2160x1440 resolution of the Pro 3.
B
12
S
2
Posts: 80
Reputation: 816

Next

Return to Construct 2 General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eraserhead, Sockratease and 7 guests