undecided about purchasing C2

Discussion and feedback on Construct 2

Post » Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:52 pm

newt wrote:They can't guarantee a third party's work any more than the post office delivering mail on expected days.
You can expect the performance to be the same as that of the developer.

im talking about exe, and this node webkit with chrome process to convert exes.. this shoul be guaranteed or not?
sorry my bed English ^_^
B
14
S
7
G
7
Posts: 542
Reputation: 6,061

Post » Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:16 pm

@NN81 As long as your project works fine in the Chrome browser, it will work as fine in node webkit since both are the same thing.
And concerning APK, you are not forced to use 3rd party sevices, in fact you can build your apks by your own locally ( without the need of internet ), from the index.html to .apk via cordova.
Tell me if your're interested so I can explain how ( it's a long process, but as soon as you finish setting up things, you get to build apks in a matter of seconds, so it's worth the effort).
I've tested before and it worked blazingly fast on my android device.
Last edited by X3M on Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Banned User
B
17
S
7
G
24
Posts: 388
Reputation: 14,494

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:14 am

X3M wrote:@NN81 As long is your project works fine in the Chrome browser, it will work as fine in node webkit since both are the same thing.
And concerning APK, you are not forced to use 3rd party sevices, in fact you can build your apks by your own locally ( without the need of internet ), from the index.html to .apk via cordova.
Tell me if your're interested so I can explain how ( it's a long process, but as soon as you finish setting up things, you get to build apks in a matter of seconds, so it's worth the effort).
I've tested before and it worked blazingly fast on my android device.


Any tutorials on that?
It would save me a lot of time.
B
31
S
13
G
21
Posts: 843
Reputation: 14,691

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:23 am

@The Mnk Sure I'll post one in the tutorials section
Banned User
B
17
S
7
G
24
Posts: 388
Reputation: 14,494

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:30 am

X3M wrote:@The Mnk Sure I'll post one in the tutorials section


Thanks, I'll keep an eye on that.
B
31
S
13
G
21
Posts: 843
Reputation: 14,691

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 1:12 am

Banned User
B
17
S
7
G
24
Posts: 388
Reputation: 14,494

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:18 pm

@X3M Thank you for that tutorial, I was just about to ask you for it. I'll check it out soon.

@NN81 What kind of game you want to create?
B
137
S
33
G
17
Posts: 1,560
Reputation: 20,792

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 1:08 pm

glerikud wrote:@X3M Thank you for that tutorial, I was just about to ask you for it. I'll check it out soon.

@NN81 What kind of game you want to create?


no game for the moment, only undecided about purchase Construct 2 or Clickteam Fusion 2.5
sorry my bed English ^_^
B
14
S
7
G
7
Posts: 542
Reputation: 6,061

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 1:41 pm

Both of them are almost the same but I would say C2 events sheet is by far more powerful and flexible (personal opinion after using both).
B
43
S
12
G
14
Posts: 488
Reputation: 10,570

Post » Sun Feb 12, 2017 3:26 pm

NN81 wrote:no game for the moment, only undecided about purchase Construct 2 or Clickteam Fusion 2.5

Then my suggestion to you: right now, buy C2. The event system is far ahead of CTF 2.5's. However, if you can afford to wait more than half a year, then I'd think about CTF 3 or C3 (whichever suits your needs). Clickteam is currently improving CTF 3's event system, closing the gap between Construct and Fusion in that regard.
B
137
S
33
G
17
Posts: 1,560
Reputation: 20,792

PreviousNext

Return to Construct 2 General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest